What is Bitcoin Name Service (BNS)? A BTC Domain Guide
24 March 2025
Blockchain technology has revolutionized the way we think about security, data management, and transparency. However, not all blockchains in a decentralized network are created equally.
In this article, we will discuss comprehensively the two types of blockchain technology: public and private. We will also look at their differences, characteristics, advantages, and applications and use cases in the Web3 world.
Understanding the distinctions between the public and private blockchain infrastructure is important for developers, organizations, and crypto enthusiasts who want to leverage the broader blockchain ecosystem.
Public blockchains are completely open networks where anyone can participate in the network without being restricted. Public blockchains are immutable, decentralized, and open-source network.
Users on the public network can access the data stored on the blockchain and validate transactions. Many public blockchains often use consensus mechanisms like Proof of Stake (PoS) or Proof of Work (PoW).
Decentralization: Public blockchains are designed to be free from central authority, preventing control over the network.
Transparency: All transactions stored on the public chains are publicly recorded and verifiable.
Security: Since public blockchains are decentralized, robust consensus mechanisms are used to protect against tampering.
Trustless Environment: Unlike permissioned blockchains, users who have access to the network do not need to trust each other or an independent party.
Immutability: Data stored on the blockchain platform cannot be changed.
Global Accessibility: Anyone with internet access can participate in the network, making it democratic and inclusive.
Scalability Issues: Unlike private blockchains, public blockchains can be slow and resource-intensive because of the high transaction volumes and large number of validators.
Energy Consumption: Consensus mechanisms such as PoW use large energy.
Limited Privacy: Transaction details on these blockchains can also be publicly accessible.
Private blockchains are centralized and restricted networks where access is controlled by a specific group of users, often within a consortium or an organization. Private blockchains are typically used for control over participants and data.
Permissioned Access: Only authorized participants can join the network, validate transactions, and view data.
Centralized Control: A private blockchain may be controlled by a single organization or group
Customizable Rules: Governance structures can be designed on a closed network to meet specific needs.
Restricted Access: Participants on private blockchains may need access to join the network.
Enhanced Privacy: Private blockchains often promote privacy by limiting data to authorized participants.
Improved Efficiency: Private blockchains have faster confirmation times compared to public blockchains.
Regulatory Compliance: Permissioned blockchains allow controls for legal requirements.
Centralization Risks: Private or permissioned blockchain networks may lack the security and decentralization features of public blockchains.
Limited Transparency: Data added to the blockchain is not publicly verifiable.
Reduced Trust: Participants using these blockchain solutions must trust the central authority.
Understanding the types of blockchains is crucial for people who are interested in the principles of blockchain technology. In this section, we will be looking at the different types of blockchain: private and public blockchains.
A public blockchain is a permissionless and decentralized distributed ledger that is open to anyone. It is transparent, immutable, fully decentralized, and requires consensus mechanisms like PoS and PoW.
Common Use Cases for Public Blockchains:
Cryptocurrencies like Ethereum and Bitcoin
Voting systems
Open finance (DeFi)
A blockchain is a private blockchain when it is controlled by a group or an organization. The nature of private blockchains is restricted, centralized, scalable, and fast because of the limited number of validators on the network.
Common Use Cases:
Private blockchain used by an enterprise for record-keeping
Internal audits
Supply chain monitoring
Enterprise blockchains are semi-decentralized networks controlled by an organization or a group, instead of a single entity. This type of blockchain shares governance, requires access, and is partially decentralized.
Pros:
Consortium blockchain is a private chain that promotes more trust and transparency than private chains
Collaborative control
Perfect for inter-organizational operations
Cons:
Governance can be overwhelming and complex
Still lacks the full features of decentralization
Common Use Cases of consortium blockchains:
Banking networks and financial services
Healthcare data sharing
Cross-company logistics
Hybrid blockchains combine the public and private blockchains, providing a flexible and customizable answer for organizations.
Key Features:
Hybrid blockchains enable controlled data sharing and transparency.
There is a flexible architecture
These blockchains leverage the scalability benefits of private blockchains while using the blockchain features of public.
Pros:
Hybrid blockchains promote high scalability and control
Facilitate interoperability through seamless interactions between public and private blockchain networks.
Hybrid blockchain analytics allow organizations to manage sensitive data while using public blockchain benefits.
Cons:
More technically complex
Risk of centralization in some areas
Common Use Cases:
Government records
Real estate and identity management
Enterprise collaborations with public verification
Feature | Public Blockchain | Private Blockchain |
Access | Open to everyone | Restricted to authorized users |
Transparency | High | Limited |
Security | Security is strong, but it can be exposed to 51% attacks | Controlled security, vulnerable to internal threats |
Speed | Slower because of consensus mechanisms | Faster because of limited nodes |
Decentralization | Fully decentralized | Partially |
Use Cases | Public records and cryptocurrencies | Internal audits, supply chain, and enterprise solutions. |
The choice between a public and private blockchain depends on your specific industry, goals, and required level of accountability or control. Consider the following factors:
You need an open, decentralized, and transparent network. Bitcoin and Ethereum blockchains might be perfect.
Public blockchains can provide robust security because of their large number of validators and decentralized nature.
If you're building apps for NFTs, crypto, or DeFi.
You need to maintain control over confidentiality and data access.
You want to handle sensitive internal information like inventory or employee records.
You want faster transaction processing and greater scalability.
Recommended YouTube Videos to learn about the decentralized nature of public and private blockchain networks:
Understanding the differences between public and private blockchains is essential for leveraging their potential effectively. Public blockchains offer transparency and decentralization, ideal for open systems like cryptocurrencies. Private blockchains provide control and efficiency, suitable for internal business operations. By aligning blockchain type with specific needs and objectives, organizations and individuals can harness the technology's full benefits.
The primary distinction lies in access control. Public blockchains are open to anyone, promoting decentralization and transparency. In contrast, private blockchains restrict access to authorized participants, offering greater control and privacy.
Security depends on the context. Public blockchains benefit from widespread node distribution, making them resistant to certain attacks. Private blockchains, while offering controlled access, can be vulnerable if the central authority is compromised.
Yes, hybrid blockchains combine elements of both, allowing for customizable access and control levels, catering to specific organizational needs.
Private blockchains are often preferred by businesses due to their controlled environments, faster transaction speeds, and compliance capabilities.